Interactive Online Learning

Sean Lee Sean Lee

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Data-Engineer-Associate최신버전덤프공부최신덤프샘플문제다운로드

IT인증시험이 다가오는데 어느 부분부터 공부해야 할지 망설이고 있다구요? 가장 간편하고 시간을 절약하며 한방에 자격증을 취득할수 있는 최고의 방법을 추천해드립니다. 바로 우리PassTIP IT인증덤프제공사이트입니다. PassTIP는 고품질 고적중율을 취지로 하여 여러분들인 한방에 시험에서 패스하도록 최선을 다하고 있습니다. Amazon인증Data-Engineer-Associate시험준비중이신 분들은PassTIP 에서 출시한Amazon인증Data-Engineer-Associate 덤프를 선택하세요.

Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate인증시험덤프는 적중율이 높아 100% Amazon Data-Engineer-AssociateAmazon Data-Engineer-Associate시험에서 패스할수 있게 만들어져 있습니다. 덤프는 IT전문가들이 최신 실러버스에 따라 몇년간의 노하우와 경험을 충분히 활용하여 연구제작해낸 시험대비자료입니다. 저희 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프는 모든 시험유형을 포함하고 있는 퍼펙트한 자료기에 한방에 시험패스 가능합니다.

>> Data-Engineer-Associate최신버전 덤프공부 <<

Data-Engineer-Associate최신버전 덤프공부최신버전 인증덤프

힘든Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate시험패스도 간단하게 ! PassTIP의 전문가들은Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate 최신시험문제를 연구하여 시험대비에 딱 맞는Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프를 출시하였습니다. PassTIP덤프를 구매하시면 많은 정력을 기울이지 않으셔도 시험을 패스하여 자격증취득이 가능합니다. PassTIP의 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프로 자격증 취득의 꿈을 이루어보세요.

최신 AWS Certified Data Engineer Data-Engineer-Associate 무료샘플문제 (Q139-Q144):

질문 # 139
A company uses an Amazon QuickSight dashboard to monitor usage of one of the company's applications. The company uses AWS Glue jobs to process data for the dashboard. The company stores the data in a single Amazon S3 bucket. The company adds new data every day.
A data engineer discovers that dashboard queries are becoming slower over time. The data engineer determines that the root cause of the slowing queries is long-running AWS Glue jobs.
Which actions should the data engineer take to improve the performance of the AWS Glue jobs? (Choose two.)

A. Increase the AWS Glue instance size by scaling up the worker type.
B. Partition the data that is in the S3 bucket. Organize the data by year, month, and day.
C. Modify the 1AM role that grants access to AWS glue to grant access to all S3 features.
D. Convert the AWS Glue schema to the DynamicFrame schema class.
E. Adjust AWS Glue job scheduling frequency so the jobs run half as many times each day.

정답：A,B

설명：
Partitioning the data in the S3 bucket can improve the performance of AWS Glue jobs by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and processed. By organizing the data by year, month, and day, the AWS Glue job can use partition pruning to filter out irrelevant data and only read the data that matches the query criteria. This can speed up the data processing and reduce the cost of running the AWS Glue job. Increasing the AWS Glue instance size by scaling up the worker type can also improve the performance of AWS Glue jobs by providing more memory and CPU resources for the Spark execution engine. This can help the AWS Glue job handle larger data sets and complex transformations more efficiently. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant, as they do not affect the performance of the AWS Glue jobs. Converting the AWS Glue schema to the DynamicFrame schema class does not improve the performance, but rather provides additional functionality and flexibility for data manipulation. Adjusting the AWS Glue job scheduling frequency does not improve the performance, but rather reduces the frequency of data updates. Modifying the IAM role that grants access to AWS Glue does not improve the performance, but rather affects the security and permissions of the AWS Glue service. Reference:
Optimising Glue Scripts for Efficient Data Processing: Part 1 (Section: Partitioning Data in S3) Best practices to optimize cost and performance for AWS Glue streaming ETL jobs (Section: Development tools) Monitoring with AWS Glue job run insights (Section: Requirements) AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide (Chapter 5, page 133)

질문 # 140
A company currently stores all of its data in Amazon S3 by using the S3 Standard storage class.
A data engineer examined data access patterns to identify trends. During the first 6 months, most data files are accessed several times each day. Between 6 months and 2 years, most data files are accessed once or twice each month. After 2 years, data files are accessed only once or twice each year.
The data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy to develop new data storage rules. The new storage solution must continue to provide high availability.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?

A. Transition objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years.
B. Transition objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years.
C. Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years.
D. Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years.

정답：C

설명：
To achieve the most cost-effective storage solution, the data engineer needs to use an S3 Lifecycle policy that transitions objects to lower-cost storage classes based on their access patterns, and deletes them when they are no longer needed. The storage classes should also provide high availability, which means they should be resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
* Transition objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 6 months. S3 Standard-IA is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. It offers the same high durability, throughput, and low latency as S3 Standard, but with a lower storage cost and a retrieval fee2. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed once or twice each month. S3 Standard-IA also provides high availability, as it stores data redundantly across multiple Availability Zones1.
* Transfer objects to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 2 years. S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is rarely accessed and can tolerate a 12- hour retrieval time. It is ideal for long-term archiving and digital preservation3. Therefore, it is suitable for data files that are accessed only once or twice each year. S3 Glacier Deep Archive also provides high availability, as it stores data across at least three geographically dispersed Availability Zones1.
* Delete objects when they are no longer needed. The data engineer can specify an expiration action in the S3 Lifecycle policy to delete objects after a certain period of time. This will reduce the storage cost and comply with any data retention policies.
Option C is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it transitions objects to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) after
6 months. S3 One Zone-IA is similar to S3 Standard-IA, but it stores data in a single Availability Zone. This means it has a lower availability and durability than S3 Standard-IA, and it is not resilient to the loss of data in a single Availability Zone1. Therefore, it does not provide high availability as required.
Option B is incorrect because it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years. S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval is a storage class that offers secure and durable storage for data that is accessed infrequently and can tolerate a retrieval time of minutes to hours. It is more expensive than S3 Glacier Deep Archive, and it is not suitable for data that is accessed only once or twice each year3. Therefore, it is not the most cost-effective option.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and B. It transitions objects to S3 One Zone- IA after 6 months, which does not provide high availability, and it transfers objects to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 2 years, which is not the most cost-effective option.
References:
* 1: Amazon S3 storage classes - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* 2: Amazon S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* 3: Amazon S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [4]: Expiring objects - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [5]: Managing your storage lifecycle - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [6]: Examples of S3 Lifecycle configuration - Amazon Simple Storage Service
* [7]: Amazon S3 Lifecycle further optimizes storage cost savings with new features - What's New with AWS

질문 # 141
A data engineer must ingest a source of structured data that is in .csv format into an Amazon S3 data lake. The
.csv files contain 15 columns. Data analysts need to run Amazon Athena queries on one or two columns of the dataset. The data analysts rarely query the entire file.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Use an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in .csv format.
B. Create an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source.
Configure the job to ingest the data into the data lake in JSON format.
C. Use an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in Apache Avro format.
D. Create an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source.Configure the job to write the data into the data lake in Apache Parquet format.

정답：D

설명：
Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena supports various data formats, such as CSV,JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
Therefore, creating an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source and writing the data into the data lake in Apache Parquet format will meet the requirements most cost-effectively. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation, data cataloging, and data loading. AWS Glue ETL jobs allow you to transform and load data from various sources into various targets, using either a graphical interface (AWS Glue Studio) or a code-based interface (AWS Glue console or AWS Glue API). By using AWS Glue ETL jobs, you can easily convert the data from CSV to Parquet format, without having to write or manage any code. Parquet is a column-oriented format that allows Athena to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. This solution will also reduce the cost of Athena queries, as Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned from S3.
The other options are not as cost-effective as creating an AWS Glue ETL job to write the data into the data lake in Parquet format. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in .csv format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as .csv is a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Creating an AWS Glue ETL job to ingest the data into the data lake in JSON format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as JSON is also a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in Apache Avro format will improve the query performance, as Avro is a column-oriented format that supports compression and encoding, but it will require more operational effort, as you will need to write and maintain PySpark code to convert the data from CSV to Avro format.
References:
Amazon Athena
Choosing the Right Data Format
AWS Glue
[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide], Chapter 5: Data Analysis and Visualization, Section 5.1: Amazon Athena

질문 # 142
A company currently uses a provisioned Amazon EMR cluster that includes general purpose Amazon EC2 instances. The EMR cluster uses EMR managed scaling between one to five task nodes for the company's long-running Apache Spark extract, transform, and load (ETL) job. The company runs the ETL job every day.
When the company runs the ETL job, the EMR cluster quickly scales up to five nodes. The EMR cluster often reaches maximum CPU usage, but the memory usage remains under 30%.
The company wants to modify the EMR cluster configuration to reduce the EMR costs to run the daily ETL job.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?

A. Increase the maximum number of task nodes for EMR managed scaling to 10.
B. Change the task node type from general purpose EC2 instances to memory optimized EC2 instances.
C. Switch the task node type from general purpose EC2 instances to compute optimized EC2 instances.
D. Reduce the scaling cooldown period for the provisioned EMR cluster.

정답：C

설명：
The company's Apache Spark ETL job on Amazon EMR uses high CPU but low memory, meaning that compute-optimized EC2 instances would be the most cost-effective choice. These instances are designed for high-performance compute applications, where CPU usage is high, but memory needs are minimal, which is exactly the case here.
Compute Optimized Instances:
Compute-optimized instances, such as the C5 series, provide a higher ratio of CPU to memory, which is more suitable for jobs with high CPU usage and relatively low memory consumption.
Switching from general-purpose EC2 instances to compute-optimized instances can reduce costs while improving performance, as these instances are optimized for workloads like Spark jobs that perform a lot of computation.
Reference:
Managed Scaling: The EMR cluster's scaling is currently managed between 1 and 5 nodes, so changing the instance type will leverage the current scaling strategy but optimize it for the workload.
Alternatives Considered:
A (Increase task nodes to 10): Increasing the number of task nodes would increase costs without necessarily improving performance. Since memory usage is low, the bottleneck is more likely the CPU, which compute-optimized instances can handle better.
B (Memory optimized instances): Memory-optimized instances are not suitable since the current job is CPU-bound, and memory usage remains low (under 30%).
D (Reduce scaling cooldown): This could marginally improve scaling speed but does not address the need for cost optimization and improved CPU performance.
Amazon EMR Cluster Optimization
Compute Optimized EC2 Instances

질문 # 143
A company stores data from an application in an Amazon DynamoDB table that operates in provisioned capacity mode. The workloads of the application have predictable throughput load on a regular schedule.
Every Monday, there is an immediate increase in activity early in the morning. The application has very low usage during weekends.
The company must ensure that the application performs consistently during peak usage times.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?

A. Increase the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times.
B. Change the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. Configure the table to scale up and scale down based on the load on the table.
C. Use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times.
Schedule lower capacity during off-peak times.
D. Divide the table into two tables. Provision each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. Spread queries evenly across both tables.

정답：C

설명：
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity:
provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.
The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:
It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.
It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on-demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with nominimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.
It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over-provisioning your table2.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don't need1.
It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables. You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.
It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns.
You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.
Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.
It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.
References:
1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB
2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB
3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB
[4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB
[5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog
[6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog
[7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)

질문 # 144
......

지난 몇년동안 IT산업의 지속적인 발전과 성장을 통해Amazon 인증Data-Engineer-Associate시험은 IT인증시험중의 이정표로 되어 많은 인기를 누리고 있습니다. IT인증시험을PassTIP덤프로 준비해야만 하는 이유는PassTIP덤프는 IT업계전문가들이 실제시험문제를 연구하여 시험문제에 대비하여 예상문제를 제작했다는 점에 있습니다.

Data-Engineer-Associate최신버전 시험대비 공부문제: https://www.passtip.net/Data-Engineer-Associate-pass-exam.html

PassTIP의 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프는 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate시험문제변경에 따라 주기적으로 업데이트를 진행하여 덤프가 항상 가장 최신버전이도록 업데이트를 진행하고 있습니다.구매한 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프가 업데이트되면 저희측에서 자동으로 구매시 사용한 메일주소에 업데이트된 최신버전을 발송해드리는데 해당 덤프의 구매시간이 1년미만인 분들은 업데이트서비스를 받을수 있습니다, 이렇게 중요한 Data-Engineer-Associate시험인만큼 고객님께서도 시험에 관해 검색하다 저희 사이트까지 찾아오게 되었을것입니다, PassTIP Data-Engineer-Associate최신버전 시험대비 공부문제선택함으로 당신이 바로 진정한IT인사입니다.

나는 그 의원이 아니다, 그러면서 그는 오월과 강산에게 투명하고 작은 약병을 건넸다, PassTIP의 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프는 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate시험문제변경에 따라 주기적으로 업데이트를 진행하여 덤프가 항상 가장 최신버전이도록 업데이트를 진행하고 있습니다.구매한 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프가 업데이트되면 저희측에서 자동으로 구매시 사용한 메일주소에 업데이트된 최신버전을 발송해드리는데 해당 덤프의 구매시간이 1년미만인 분들은 업데이트서비스를 받을수 있습니다.

시험패스 가능한 Data-Engineer-Associate최신버전 덤프공부 최신 덤프모음집

이렇게 중요한 Data-Engineer-Associate시험인만큼 고객님께서도 시험에 관해 검색하다 저희 사이트까지 찾아오게 되었을것입니다, PassTIP선택함으로 당신이 바로 진정한IT인사입니다, 이러한 사이트에서 학습가이드와 온라인서비스도 지원되고Data-Engineer-Associate있습니다만 PassTIP 는 이미 이러한 사이트를 뛰어넘은 실력으로 업계에서 우리만의 이미지를 지키고 있습니다.

PassTIP에서 제공하는Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate덤프로 시험 준비하시면 편안하게 시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다.